Artists navigating environmental costs of AI art

AI is opening new doors for artists, but there are environmental costs to consider. Two artists share their views and approaches.
Iridescent pink web sculptures pictured hanging in a pitch black setting.

The past few months have seen some tricky environmental questions enter artists’ circles on the topic of AI.

These include whether traditional art-making methods – using centuries-old materials such as paint, ink, cloth and glue – are more or less environmentally damaging than art made with AI software like ChatGPT, Stable Diffusion, DALL-E and the like.

It’s a vexing question that appears within a wider conversation being led by various Silicon Valley tech-heads who are also realising the devastating energy costs of their AI software as it becomes adopted by many millions of users across the globe.

Unlock Padlock Icon

Unlock this content?

Access this content and more

ArtsHub's Arts Feature Writer Jo Pickup is based in Perth. An arts writer and manager, she has worked as a journalist and broadcaster for media such as the ABC, RTRFM and The West Australian newspaper, contributing media content and commentary on art, culture and design. She has also worked for arts organisations such as Fremantle Arts Centre, STRUT dance, and the Aboriginal Arts Centre Hub of WA, as well as being a sessional arts lecturer at The Western Australian Academy of Performing Arts (WAAPA).